Today I was chatting with a friend of mine about how successful (or unsuccessful) the gay movement has been lately. Like a lot of conversations along these lines we got bogged down for a bit in the choice/not-a-choice debate. So long as this is an issue it slows down the movement; and the problem with it is that it doesn't even matter what the truth of whether or not gayness is a choice even turns out to be.
When I said this he was like, "but if it is not a choice then people need to accept it, because that is just how we are". Yes, this is the traditional logic behind it, and it has caused those who oppose gay civil rights to create less than credible Research (kind of like the stuff the tobacco companies used to come up with) to say that homosexuality is a choice. The response needs to be, "SO WHAT"
A quick review of American civil rights does in fact come up with a list that is dominated by things people generally can not change: race, ethnicity, country of origin, sex (hehe this one is funny to me). Then there is one more. Religion! Now, whatever anyone thinks about ontological claims the various religions claim, one can not miss the fact the people can CHOOSE to be whatever religion they want. In fact, one could be a different religion every day of the week, not that this ever happens. So we are left with a question. What does religion have in common with the other "immutable" characteristics on the list?
Self identity! All of the things that people should not discriminate other by are fundamental components of ones self identity. Even religion, the obvious choice, is still at the core of who some people are. to deny them this, or oppress them for their choice, would be harming a fundamental part of who they are as people. As such, we can see how this is hurtful and wrong.
One only needs to see on pride parade to understand just how fundamental sexuality is to the self identity of the gay community. In fact it is the only thing that separates us from the heteros. As a fundamental part of who we are, oppressing and denying civil rights to the gay community is wrong for the same reason that oppressing Muslims, or Christians would be wrong.
I believe straight folk have a hard time empathising with, and thus supporting, the gay movement because the conversation generally does not turn to those things we have in common, instead focusing far to much on our small differences. Everyone understands self identity, for without it we are not persons. As such, I think we can get more straight folk to understand that, choice or no, opposition to a group of people fighting for their self identity and civil rights is wrong. We need to move the dialogue in a new direction; a direction that will allow more people to understand just what we are doing.
Alexandria
Kavanaugh for SCOTUS: So how fucked are we?
7 years ago